1) What Are the Differences for the Packets You Captures Between Downloading and Uploading?

Standard protocol for transferring files over TCP/IP networks

File Transfer Protocol
Communication protocol
Purpose File transfer
Developer(s) Abhay Bhushan for RFC 959
Introduction April sixteen, 1971; fifty years ago  (1971-04-16)
OSI layer Awarding layer
Port(due south) 21 for control, 20 for data transfer
RFC(s) RFC 959

The File Transfer Protocol (FTP) is a standard communication protocol used for the transfer of computer files from a server to a customer on a computer network. FTP is congenital on a client–server model architecture using separate control and data connections between the customer and the server.[1] FTP users may cosign themselves with a clear-text sign-in protocol, normally in the class of a username and password, but can connect anonymously if the server is configured to allow it. For secure manual that protects the username and password, and encrypts the content, FTP is often secured with SSL/TLS (FTPS) or replaced with SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP).

The offset FTP client applications were command-line programs developed before operating systems had graphical user interfaces, and are still shipped with most Windows, Unix, and Linux operating systems.[2] [3] Many FTP clients and automation utilities have since been developed for desktops, servers, mobile devices, and hardware, and FTP has been incorporated into productivity applications, such equally HTML editors.

In Jan 2021, support for the FTP protocol was disabled in Google Chrome 88,[4] and disabled in Firefox 88.0.[5] In July 2021, Firefox ninety dropped FTP entirely,[half-dozen] and Google followed suit in October 2021, removing FTP entirely in Google Chrome 95.[7]

History of FTP servers [edit]

The original specification for the File Transfer Protocol was written by Abhay Bhushan and published every bit RFC 114 on 16 Apr 1971. Until 1980, FTP ran on NCP, the predecessor of TCP/IP.[2] The protocol was afterwards replaced by a TCP/IP version, RFC 765 (June 1980) and RFC 959 (October 1985), the current specification. Several proposed standards amend RFC 959, for example RFC 1579 (February 1994) enables Firewall-Friendly FTP (passive manner), RFC 2228 (June 1997) proposes security extensions, RFC 2428 (September 1998) adds support for IPv6 and defines a new type of passive mode.[8]

Protocol overview [edit]

Communication and data transfer [edit]

Illustration of starting a passive connexion using port 21

FTP may run in agile or passive mode, which determines how the information connection is established.[ix] (This sense of "style" is different from that of the MODE command in the FTP protocol, and corresponds to the PORT/PASV/EPSV/etc commands instead.) In both cases, the client creates a TCP control connection from a random, unremarkably an unprivileged, port Due north to the FTP server command port 21.

  • In agile mode, the client starts listening for incoming data connections from the server on port M. It sends the FTP control PORT Thou to inform the server on which port information technology is listening. The server and so initiates a data channel to the client from its port 20, the FTP server information port.
  • In situations where the client is backside a firewall and unable to take incoming TCP connections, passive manner may exist used. In this fashion, the customer uses the control connectedness to transport a PASV command to the server and and then receives a server IP accost and server port number from the server,[9] which the client and then uses to open up a data connection from an arbitrary customer port to the server IP address and server port number received.[10]

Both modes were updated in September 1998 to support IPv6. Farther changes were introduced to the passive mode at that time, updating it to extended passive style.[xi]

The server responds over the control connection with three-digit status codes in ASCII with an optional text message. For example, "200" (or "200 OK") ways that the last control was successful. The numbers correspond the lawmaking for the response and the optional text represents a human being-readable explanation or request (e.chiliad. <Need business relationship for storing file>).[one] An ongoing transfer of file data over the data connection can be aborted using an interrupt bulletin sent over the control connexion.

FTP needs ii ports (ane for sending and one for receiving) because it was originally designed to operate on Network Control Program (NCP), which was a simplex protocol that utilized two port addresses, establishing ii connections, for two-way communications. An odd and an even port were reserved for each application layer application or protocol. The standardization of TCP and UDP reduced the need for the use of ii simplex ports for each application down to one duplex port,[12] : fifteen but the FTP protocol was never altered to only use 1 port, and continued using two for backwards compatibility.

NAT and firewall traversal [edit]

FTP normally transfers data past having the server connect back to the customer, after the PORT control is sent by the client. This is problematic for both NATs and firewalls, which practice not allow connections from the Net towards internal hosts.[13] For NATs, an boosted complication is that the representation of the IP addresses and port number in the PORT control refer to the internal host's IP accost and port, rather than the public IP accost and port of the NAT.

There are two approaches to solve this problem. One is that the FTP client and FTP server utilize the PASV command, which causes the data connection to be established from the FTP customer to the server.[xiii] This is widely used by modern FTP clients. Another approach is for the NAT to change the values of the PORT control, using an awarding-level gateway for this purpose.[13]

Data types [edit]

While transferring data over the network, 4 data types are defined:[ii] [3] [8]

  • ASCII (Type A): Used for text. Data is converted, if needed, from the sending host's graphic symbol representation to "8-bit ASCII" before manual, and (again, if necessary) to the receiving host's character representation. As a consequence, this mode is inappropriate for files that contain data other than plain text.
  • Paradigm (TYPE I, commonly chosen Binary manner): The sending motorcar sends each file byte by byte, and the recipient stores the bytestream as it receives information technology. (Image style support has been recommended for all implementations of FTP).
  • EBCDIC (Blazon E): Used for plain text between hosts using the EBCDIC character ready.
  • Local (Type L north): Designed to support file transfer between machines which practice not use viii-bit bytes, e.1000. 36-bit systems such as DEC PDP-10s. For example, "TYPE L ix" would exist used to transfer data in 9-bit bytes, or "Type L 36" to transfer 36-bit words. Most contemporary FTP clients/servers but support L 8, which is equivalent to I.

An expired Internet Draft defined a TYPE U for transferring Unicode text files using UTF-8;[14] although the draft never became an RFC, it has been implemented by several FTP clients/servers.

Note these data types are unremarkably called "modes", although ambiguously that word is as well used to refer to active-vs-passive communication way (see above), and the modes prepare by the FTP protocol Manner command (meet beneath).

For text files (Type A and Blazon East), three different format control options are provided, to control how the file would be printed:

  • Non-print (TYPE A Northward and TYPE Eastward N) – the file does not contain any wagon control characters intended for a printer
  • Telnet (TYPE A T and TYPE E T) – the file contains Telnet (or in other words, ASCII C0) carriage control characters (CR, LF, etc)
  • ASA (TYPE A A and TYPE E A) – the file contains ASA carriage control characters

These formats were mainly relevant to line printers; most gimmicky FTP clients/servers only support the default format command of N.

File structures [edit]

File arrangement is specified using the STRU command. The post-obit file structures are defined in department three.1.ane of RFC959:

  • F or FILE structure (stream-oriented). Files are viewed as an arbitrary sequence of bytes, characters or words. This is the usual file structure on Unix systems and other systems such as CP/1000, MS-DOS and Microsoft Windows. (Section three.i.1.ane)
  • R or Tape construction (record-oriented). Files are viewed every bit divided into records, which may be fixed or variable length. This file organization is mutual on mainframe and midrange systems, such as MVS, VM/CMS, OS/400 and VMS, which back up tape-oriented filesystems.
  • P or Page structure (folio-oriented). Files are divided into pages, which may either contain information or metadata; each page may also have a header giving various attributes. This file structure was specifically designed for TENEX systems, and is by and large not supported on other platforms. RFC1123 section 4.1.2.3 recommends that this structure not exist implemented.

Most contemporary FTP clients and servers simply support STRU F. STRU R is still in use in mainframe and minicomputer file transfer applications.

Data transfer modes [edit]

Data transfer can be done in any of 3 modes:[1] [2]

  • Stream style (MODE South): Information is sent every bit a continuous stream, relieving FTP from doing any processing. Rather, all processing is left up to TCP. No Stop-of-file indicator is needed, unless the data is divided into records.
  • Cake mode (MODE B): Designed primarily for transferring record-oriented files (STRU R), although tin also be used to transfer stream-oriented (STRU F) text files. FTP puts each tape (or line) of data into several blocks (block header, byte count, and information field) and and then passes it on to TCP.[8]
  • Compressed manner (MODE C): Extends MODE B with data compression using run-length encoding.

Nearly contemporary FTP clients and servers do not implement Style B or MODE C; FTP clients and servers for mainframe and minicomputer operating systems are the exception to that.

Some FTP software also implements a DEFLATE-based compressed fashion, sometimes called "Mode Z" after the command that enables information technology. This fashion was described in an Internet Draft, but not standardized.[15]

GridFTP defines additional modes, MODE Due east[16] and MODE X,[17] every bit extensions of MODE B.

Additional commands [edit]

More recent implementations of FTP support the Change Fact: Modification Time (MFMT) command, which allows a client to adjust that file attribute remotely, enabling the preservation of that aspect when uploading files.[xviii] [xix]

To retrieve a remote file timestamp, at that place's MDTM command. Some servers (and clients) support nonstandard syntax of the MDTM command with 2 arguments, that works the same manner as MFMT [20]

Login [edit]

FTP login uses normal username and countersign scheme for granting access.[2] The username is sent to the server using the USER command, and the password is sent using the PASS control.[2] This sequence is unencrypted "on the wire", so may exist vulnerable to a network sniffing attack.[21] If the information provided by the customer is accustomed past the server, the server will ship a greeting to the customer and the session will embark.[2] If the server supports information technology, users may log in without providing login credentials, only the aforementioned server may authorize only express access for such sessions.[2]

Anonymous FTP [edit]

A host that provides an FTP service may provide bearding FTP access.[two] Users typically log into the service with an 'anonymous' (lower-case and instance-sensitive in some FTP servers) account when prompted for user proper name. Although users are unremarkably asked to send their electronic mail accost instead of a password,[3] no verification is really performed on the supplied data.[22] Many FTP hosts whose purpose is to provide software updates will let bearding logins.[iii]

Differences from HTTP [edit]

HTTP substantially fixes the bugs in FTP that made it inconvenient to use for many small imperceptible transfers as are typical in web pages.

FTP has a stateful control connexion which maintains a current working directory and other flags, and each transfer requires a secondary connection through which the information are transferred. In "passive" mode this secondary connection is from client to server, whereas in the default "active" manner this connection is from server to client. This apparent part reversal when in active mode, and random port numbers for all transfers, is why firewalls and NAT gateways take such a difficult time with FTP. HTTP is stateless and multiplexes command and data over a single connection from client to server on well-known port numbers, which trivially passes through NAT gateways and is uncomplicated for firewalls to manage.

Setting upwards an FTP control connection is quite ho-hum due to the circular-trip delays of sending all of the required commands and awaiting responses, so it is customary to bring upward a control connectedness and hold it open for multiple file transfers rather than drop and re-establish the session afresh each time. In contrast, HTTP originally dropped the connection subsequently each transfer considering doing so was and so cheap. While HTTP has later gained the power to reuse the TCP connection for multiple transfers, the conceptual model is still of contained requests rather than a session.

When FTP is transferring over the information connection, the command connection is idle. If the transfer takes too long, the firewall or NAT may decide that the command connexion is dead and stop tracking it, finer breaking the connection and disruptive the download. The single HTTP connection is only idle between requests and it is normal and expected for such connections to be dropped after a time-out.

Software support [edit]

Web browser [edit]

Nigh common web browsers can think files hosted on FTP servers, although they may non support protocol extensions such as FTPS.[3] [23] When an FTP—rather than an HTTP—URL is supplied, the attainable contents on the remote server are presented in a manner that is like to that used for other web content. FireFTP is an browser extension designed as a full-featured FTP client, it could be run within Firefox in the past, but it's now recommend working with Waterfox.

Google Chrome removed FTP support entirely in Chrome 88.[24] As of 2019, Mozilla was discussing proposals, including only removing support for old FTP implementations that are no longer in use to simplify their code.[25] [26] In Apr, 2021, Mozilla released Firefox 88.0 which disabled FTP support by default.[27] In July 2021, Firefox 90 dropped FTP support entirely.[six]

Syntax [edit]

FTP URL syntax is described in RFC 1738, taking the form: ftp://[user[:password]@]host[:port]/url-path (the bracketed parts are optional).

For example, the URL ftp://public.ftp-servers.example.com/mydirectory/myfile.txt represents the file myfile.txt from the directory mydirectory on the server public.ftp-servers.example.com as an FTP resources. The URL ftp://user001:secretpassword@private.ftp-servers.example.com/mydirectory/myfile.txt adds a specification of the username and password that must be used to access this resources.

More details on specifying a username and password may be found in the browsers' documentation (e.yard., Firefox[28] and Net Explorer[29]). Past default, most web browsers use passive (PASV) way, which more easily traverses end-user firewalls.

Some variation has existed in how unlike browsers treat path resolution in cases where there is a non-root domicile directory for a user.[thirty]

Download manager [edit]

About mutual download managers can receive files hosted on FTP servers, while some of them also give the interface to retrieve the files hosted on FTP servers. DownloadStudio and Net Download Accelerator allows non only download a file from FTP server merely also view the list of files on a FTP server.[31] [32]

Security [edit]

FTP was not designed to be a secure protocol, and has many security weaknesses.[33] In May 1999, the authors of RFC 2577 listed a vulnerability to the post-obit bug:

  • Fauna-force assault
  • FTP bounce attack
  • Packet capture
  • Port stealing (guessing the side by side open port and usurping a legitimate connectedness)
  • Spoofing set on
  • Username enumeration
  • DoS or DDoS

FTP does not encrypt its traffic; all transmissions are in clear text, and usernames, passwords, commands and data can be read past anyone able to perform packet capture (sniffing) on the network.[2] [33] This problem is common to many of the Net Protocol specifications (such as SMTP, Telnet, POP and IMAP) that were designed prior to the creation of encryption mechanisms such equally TLS or SSL.[eight]

Common solutions to this problem include:

  1. Using the secure versions of the insecure protocols, e.g., FTPS instead of FTP and TelnetS instead of Telnet.
  2. Using a different, more secure protocol that tin can handle the job, e.yard. SSH File Transfer Protocol or Secure Re-create Protocol.
  3. Using a secure tunnel such equally Secure Beat out (SSH) or virtual private network (VPN).

FTP over SSH [edit]

FTP over SSH is the exercise of tunneling a normal FTP session over a Secure Beat out connection.[33] Because FTP uses multiple TCP connections (unusual for a TCP/IP protocol that is still in utilise), it is particularly hard to tunnel over SSH. With many SSH clients, attempting to fix a tunnel for the command channel (the initial client-to-server connection on port 21) volition protect but that channel; when data is transferred, the FTP software at either finish sets up new TCP connections (data channels) and thus take no confidentiality or integrity protection.

Otherwise, it is necessary for the SSH client software to have specific knowledge of the FTP protocol, to monitor and rewrite FTP control channel letters and autonomously open new bundle forwardings for FTP data channels. Software packages that support this mode include:

  • Tectia ConnectSecure (Win/Linux/Unix)[34] of SSH Communications Security'due south software suite

Derivatives [edit]

FTPS [edit]

Explicit FTPS is an extension to the FTP standard that allows clients to request FTP sessions to exist encrypted. This is done past sending the "AUTH TLS" command. The server has the option of allowing or denying connections that practise non request TLS. This protocol extension is defined in RFC 4217. Implicit FTPS is an outdated standard for FTP that required the use of a SSL or TLS connectedness. It was specified to employ different ports than evidently FTP.

SSH File Transfer Protocol [edit]

The SSH file transfer protocol (chronologically the 2d of the two protocols abbreviated SFTP) transfers files and has a like command set for users, only uses the Secure Shell protocol (SSH) to transfer files. Different FTP, information technology encrypts both commands and information, preventing passwords and sensitive data from being transmitted openly over the network. It cannot interoperate with FTP software.

Trivial File Transfer Protocol [edit]

Piddling File Transfer Protocol (TFTP) is a simple, lock-footstep FTP that allows a client to get a file from or put a file onto a remote host. 1 of its primary uses is in the early stages of booting from a local expanse network, because TFTP is very elementary to implement. TFTP lacks security and most of the avant-garde features offered by more robust file transfer protocols such as File Transfer Protocol. TFTP was first standardized in 1981 and the current specification for the protocol can be institute in RFC 1350.

Simple File Transfer Protocol [edit]

Simple File Transfer Protocol (the first protocol abbreviated SFTP), as defined past RFC 913, was proposed as an (unsecured) file transfer protocol with a level of complexity intermediate between TFTP and FTP. It was never widely accustomed on the Net, and is now assigned Historic condition by the IETF. It runs through port 115, and frequently receives the initialism of SFTP. It has a command set of 11 commands and support three types of data transmission: ASCII, binary and continuous. For systems with a word size that is a multiple of 8 bits, the implementation of binary and continuous is the same. The protocol besides supports login with user ID and password, hierarchical folders and file management (including rename, delete, upload, download, download with overwrite, and download with suspend).

FTP commands [edit]

FTP reply codes [edit]

Beneath is a summary of FTP reply codes that may exist returned by an FTP server. These codes have been standardized in RFC 959 by the IETF. The answer code is a 3-digit value. The first digit is used to betoken one of three possible outcomes — success, failure, or to indicate an fault or incomplete reply:

  • 2yz – Success respond
  • 4yz or 5yz – Failure respond
  • 1yz or 3yz – Mistake or Incomplete reply

The second digit defines the kind of error:

  • x0z – Syntax. These replies refer to syntax errors.
  • x1z – Information. Replies to requests for data.
  • x2z – Connections. Replies referring to the command and information connections.
  • x3z – Authentication and accounting. Replies for the login process and bookkeeping procedures.
  • x4z – Non defined.
  • x5z – File organisation. These replies relay condition codes from the server file system.

The 3rd digit of the reply lawmaking is used to provide additional detail for each of the categories divers past the 2d digit.

See besides [edit]

  • Comparison of FTP customer software
  • Comparison of FTP server software packages
  • Comparing of file transfer protocols
  • Curl-loader – FTP/Southward loading/testing open-source software
  • File exchange Protocol (FXP)
  • File Service Protocol (FSP)
  • FTAM
  • FTPFS
  • Listing of FTP commands
  • List of FTP server return codes
  • Managed File Transfer
  • OBEX
  • Shared file access
  • TCP Wrapper

References [edit]

  1. ^ a b c Forouzan, B.A. (2000). TCP/IP: Protocol Suite (1st ed.). New Delhi, India: Tata McGraw-Loma Publishing Company Limited.
  2. ^ a b c d eastward f g h i j Kozierok, Charles M. (2005). "The TCP/IP Guide v3.0". Tcpipguide.com.
  3. ^ a b c d e Dean, Tamara (2010). Network+ Guide to Networks. Delmar. pp. 168–171.
  4. ^ "Deprecations and removals in Chrome 87". Retrieved 18 November 2020.
  5. ^ "Firefox 88.0, Encounter All New Features, Updates and Fixes". Retrieved 23 April 2021.
  6. ^ a b Vonau, Manuel (7 July 2021). "Firefox follows in Chrome'due south footsteps and drops FTP support (APK Download)". Android Police . Retrieved 12 July 2021. {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  7. ^ "Remove FTP support - Chrome Platform Status". world wide web.chromestatus.com . Retrieved two September 2021.
  8. ^ a b c d Clark, M.P. (2003). Data Networks IP and the Cyberspace (1st ed.). West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  9. ^ a b "Active FTP vs. Passive FTP, a Definitive Explanation". Slacksite.com.
  10. ^ RFC 959 (Standard) File Transfer Protocol (FTP). Postel, J. & Reynolds, J. (October 1985).
  11. ^ RFC 2428 (Proposed Standard) Extensions for IPv6, NAT, and Extended Passive Mode. Allman, Thousand. & Metz, C. & Ostermann, S. (September 1998).
  12. ^ Stevens, W. Richard (1994). TCP/IP Illustrated Volume I. Vol. 1. Reading, Massachusetts, USA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. ISBN0-201-63346-ix.
  13. ^ a b c Gleason, Mike (2005). "The File Transfer Protocol and Your Firewall/NAT". Ncftp.com.
  14. ^ Klensin, John. FTP TYPE Extension for Internationalized Text. I-D draft-klensin-ftpext-typeu-00. Retrieved 9 June 2020.
  15. ^ Preston, J. (January 2005). Debunk transmission mode for FTP. IETF. I-D draft-preston-ftpext-deflate-03. Retrieved 27 January 2016.
  16. ^ Allcock, Westward. (April 2003). "GridFTP: Protocol Extensions to FTP for the Grid" (PDF).
  17. ^ Mandrichenko, I. (4 May 2005). "GridFTP v2 Protocol Clarification" (PDF).
  18. ^ "MFMT FTP control". support.solarwinds.com. eleven October 2018.
  19. ^ "FTP Commands: DSIZ, MFCT, MFMT, AVBL, PASS, XPWD, XMKD | Serv-U". www.serv-u.com.
  20. ^ "MDTM FTP command". support.solarwinds.com. 11 October 2018.
  21. ^ Prince, Brian. "Should Organizations Retire FTP for Security?". Security Calendar week. Security Week. Retrieved 14 September 2017.
  22. ^ RFC 1635 (Informational) How to Utilize Bearding FTP. P. & Emtage, A. & Marine, A. (May 1994).
  23. ^ Matthews, J. (2005). Computer Networking: Cyberspace Protocols in Activity (1st ed.). Danvers, MA: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  24. ^ Sneddon, Joey (26 January 2021). "Linux Release Roundup: GParted, Lightworks, Google Chrome + More". omgubuntu.co.great britain . Retrieved 30 January 2021.
  25. ^ "1574475 - Remove FTP support".
  26. ^ "Deprecate FTP support - Chrome Platform Condition".
  27. ^ "Come across what's new in Firefox: 88.0 Firefox Release". mozilla.org. 19 April 2021. Retrieved xx April 2021.
  28. ^ "Accessing FTP servers | How to | Firefox Help". Support.mozilla.com. 5 September 2012. Retrieved 16 Jan 2013.
  29. ^ "How to Enter FTP Site Password in Net Explorer". Archived from the original on 2 July 2015. Retrieved 13 February 2020. {{cite spider web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) Written for IE versions 6 and earlier. Might piece of work with newer versions.
  30. ^ Jukka "Yucca" Korpela (18 September 1997). "FTP URLs". "IT and communication" (jkorpela.fi). Retrieved 26 January 2020.
  31. ^ "DownloadStudio - Internet Download Managing director And Download Accelerator - Features". Conceiva. Retrieved 19 October 2021.
  32. ^ "Cyberspace Download Accelerator | Features". WestByte. Retrieved xx October 2021.
  33. ^ a b c "Securing FTP using SSH". Nurdletech.com.
  34. ^ "Components of the Information Assurance Platform (section Tectia ConnectSecure)". ssh.com. Archived from the original on 31 July 2020.

Further reading [edit]

  • RFC 697 – CWD Control of FTP. July 1975.
  • RFC 959 – (Standard) File Transfer Protocol (FTP). J. Postel, J. Reynolds. Oct 1985.
  • RFC 1579 – (Informational) Firewall-Friendly FTP. February 1994.
  • RFC 1635 – (Informational) How to Employ Anonymous FTP. May 1994.
  • RFC 1639 – FTP Operation Over Big Address Records (FOOBAR). June 1994.
  • RFC 1738 – Uniform Resources Locators (URL). Dec 1994.
  • RFC 2228 – (Proposed Standard) FTP Security Extensions. Oct 1997.
  • RFC 2389 – (Proposed Standard) Characteristic negotiation mechanism for the File Transfer Protocol. August 1998.
  • RFC 2428 – (Proposed Standard) Extensions for IPv6, NAT, and Extended passive manner. September 1998.
  • RFC 2577 – (Advisory) FTP Security Considerations. May 1999.
  • RFC 2640 – (Proposed Standard) Internationalization of the File Transfer Protocol. July 1999.
  • RFC 3659 – (Proposed Standard) Extensions to FTP. P. Hethmon. March 2007.
  • RFC 5797 – (Proposed Standard) FTP Command and Extension Registry. March 2010.
  • RFC 7151 – (Proposed Standard) File Transfer Protocol HOST Control for Virtual Hosts. March 2014.
  • IANA FTP Commands and Extensions registry – The official registry of FTP Commands and Extensions

External links [edit]

  • Communication Networks/File Transfer Protocol at Wikibooks
  • FTP Server Online Tester Hallmark, encryption, mode and connectivity.
  • Anonymous FTP Servers past Country Code TLD (2012): "Offbeat Internet - Public Admission - FTP". world wide web.jumpjet.info. 2012. Retrieved 16 January 2020.

kingallogrishme.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_Transfer_Protocol

0 Response to "1) What Are the Differences for the Packets You Captures Between Downloading and Uploading?"

Enregistrer un commentaire

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel